Friday, January 28, 2011

Clinical Approach to the Septic Patient

Diagnosis For both community and hospitalised patients presenting with sepsis:

  1. Diagnose or rule out mimics of sepsis by history, physical examination and routine lab tests

  2. Initiate medical therapy appropriate for disorders mimicking sepsis

  3. If mimics of sepsis are ruled out determine site of septic focus in critically ill patients presenting with sepsis, distinguish colonisation from infection in isolates from urine, respiratory secretions and noninfected wounds

  4. Treat infection and avoid treating colonizing organisms

Interventions


A. Antibiotic interventions


i. Select empiric monotherapy based on coverage of predictable pathogens determined by focus of infection


ii. Select antibiotic with low resistance potential


iii. Select antibiotic witn a good safety profile


B. Non antibiotic interventions


i. Administer aggressive and effective intravascular volume replacement


ii. If pressors are needed, give volume replacement before pressors


iii. Restore normothermia with heating blanket


iv. Surgical intervention if sepsis is related to intra-abdominal organ perforation or obstruction or abscess. For infected devices, remove the device.


It is of paramount important to give fluid therapy before giving vasopressors. If the hypovolemia is not corrected promptly the patient will progress to a refractory shock state. By then the tissue perfusion would not respond to vasopressor drugs, even the blood pressure and intravascular volume were to be restored and cardiac output would remain depressed. The resultant lactic acidosis further depresses the myocardium and worsens the hypotension. The common complications of prolonged shock are massive bleeding, DIC and MODS which are often fatal.


Questions:


1. List the likely pathogens in gram negative sepsis in a patient who has been on meropenem for a week?


a. stenotrophomonas


b. MDR acinetobacter or pseudomonas


2. List the factors which result in failure in resolution of sepsis despite antibiotic therapy




  • wrong antibiotic choice


  • delayed administration of antibiotics


  • Inadequate source control


  • Inadequate antimicrobial blood levels


  • Inadequate penetration of the antimicrobial to the targer site


  • antimicrobial neutralization or antagonism


  • superinfection or unsuspected secondary bacterial infection


  • nonbacterial infection


  • noninfectious source of illness

2 comments:

  1. Fundamentally the only reason to give a patient a fluid challenge is to increase stroke volume and cardiac output. This assume that the patient is on the ascending portion of the Frank Starling curve and have 'recruitable'cardiac output. Therefore it is crucial to know whether the patient is fluid resposive or not. The concept of 'filling up the tank' reflects a poor understanding of human physiology.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Systemic review (Chest 2008), demonstrates that there is no association between the CVP and circulating blood volume and that CVP does not predict fluid responsiveness.
    CVP of 2 mmHg is as likely to be fluid responsive as a patient with a CVP of 20 mmHg (CCM 2007). Based on these papers, CVP should no longer (NEVER) be measured in the ICU, operating room or ER..(marik hand book of EB crit care.

    ReplyDelete